Kent Choquette reiterated the Committee's philosophy that the Advanced Core courses should primarily serve the needs of the students outside the specific area, and asked whether this course and outline met that goal. Jones suggested that all topics in the Advanced Core courses should be "must see" material for at least 60% (3 of 5) of our undergraduates. A poll of all of the Committee members present found that those from the physical electronics area considered about a credit-hour's worth needed for students in their area, and that all other areas considered the bulk of the material relevant, thus reaffirming ECE 310's position in the Advanced Core. However, with the possible exception of the communications and signal processing areas, the remainder of the committee strongly felt that the course should be shortened to three credit hours. The Committee suggested the removal of downsampling and upsampling (3 hours), the applications to speech, medical imaging, and communications (3 hours), reducing the quiz/exam time from six to three hours, and some shortening of the filter design. This would bring the total lecture hours to the 43 hours consistent with a three-credit-hour course. The Committee emphasized that it would like to see the material as well as the hours reduced to maintain a reasonable workload and reflecting the maturity of third-year students.
The Committee expressed a preference for uniformity at three credit hours for the Advanced Core courses (unless they contain a significant lab component). It was also noted that migrating the above content to ECE 410 will make it easier for ECE 410 to serve incoming graduate students who take it as a first DSP course.
The Committee recommended that the course be taught on a Monday/Wednesday/Friday schedule in the expectation that students will better absorb this material in the shorter, more frequent format.
It was decided to ask Andy Singer to revise the ECE 310 proposal in light of these suggestions.